| No comment yet

International Women's Day/ Fight for Your Rights to Party (as a woman)

This is a topic that got a lot of people talking on my own personal Facebook, and notably both people commenting were men. Is feminism now a topic that has become taboo amongst young women? I for one have often feared outing my 'feminist' views for fear of further discrimination.

It is wrong within society when a woman does not discuss here own views for fear of being perceived by her peers as being 'bossy' or 'opinionated', or even worse being viewed as 'ball breaker'. There is nothing wrong with having views on  your own gender, and the issues that effect you. It is important that women stand up for themselves in times where there is still a gender pay gap of 14%. It seems even after the Equal Pay Act 1970, women are still not valued as much in the work place.

Things are changing however.

My own interest is extremely vested, as a female footballer, I have experienced, at times, discrimination and bullying that is extremely unnecessary. As time has worn on, people have become used the idea that yes unbelievably a woman can play football at an alright standard, I am not saying I am the next Kelly Smith, but I have seen boys who frankly do not know the next thing about the offside rule.

Judging by what I have seen on Social Media in the last few days following International Women's Day, is a lot of skepticism towards the celebration of women, as to my own knowledge there is no celebrated day that honours men. I see that this causes conflict as men are not celebrated per se. However I do think that International Women's Day isn't just a day of saying 'you go girl, right on sister', it runs much deeper than that. It celebrates how far the representation of women has come, and how respect for women has become paramount, not just in society but within government legislation too.

To use the analogy of sport again however, things have changed for the better, but we are still not done. Women should be represented within sport, it is not fair to say that just because women of working age or otherwise do not participate in sport as regularly as men, that they do not deserve a voice. Preconceived perceptions of women are a huge barrier to women in sport, anything that goes against societies views on femininity are deemed as wrong and you are tarnished as masculine.

I do not particularly believe that I am a feminist but I believe that both men and women should be treated as equal. So you could say that pro-equality should become a thing as feminism has been tarnished over the years with extreme feminism. I don't particularly believe men as a whole have done anything wrong, they are just following a model of society that has worked for hundreds if not thousands of years. It is once change is administrated that fractions and conflicts occur between the genders.

Change has been long overdue, especially in sport, and it is something that I feel should be celebrated not stopped.
| No comment yet

Why is the axing of BBC3 political?

We all watch BBC3 for its mix of documentaries and comedies for a good old laugh. Ballot Box UK explains why the axing of BBC is political and what it means to you and the future of your television experience...

As the BBC is funded by taxpayers money, it is of course in the public interest if a publicly funded organisation decides to axe one of it's channels. Much like the government cuts, the axing of the BBC3 is to help the BBC save money. It does not make sense however to axe one of the organisations most popular channels- the channel last year was more popular than Channel Four for the 16-24 age group.

Many classic programs have been aired on BB3, it has managed to shake off in part it's bad reputation for producing cheap, trashy TV.  It has in essence grown with it's viewers, of whom would be extremely sad to see it go. The TV market is constantly being flooded with cheap and easy TV, it would make more sense to support a channel that makes good quality independent TV.

A further reason why we should not axe BBC3 is because young people will lose a platform where they can access programs of interest. Even though many teenagers do have access to the internet (the BBC propose that the channel will be an online only platform) not only that, BBC3 fills a gap within TV schedules across the nation. This is especially true in the life of a student, it is one of the channels that fills the gap when there is nothing on TV, everybody loves an episode of Don't Tell the Bride, or even better Snog, Marry, Avoid.

Everybody needs to be able to enjoy watching TV, comedy is central to the programming on BBC3, if it is axed, risk-taking comedy is lost. It is lost to a load of grey men in grey suits. Its time that the people spoke up to the old men in grey suits. You have to give people the opportunity to prove themselves and that is what the BBC gives to up and coming writers and presenters. If there is less opportunity for people within the entertainment industry to experiment, then what platform will they use in the future? The BBC3 gave a young James Corden a chance with hit TV show Gavin and Stacey who is to say that, that could be repeated in the future.

The axing of BBC is to me a symbol of the Coalition governments view on our generation, "ah well it doesn't matter we don't have the money fund you anymore" half arsed monologue of an apology. The channel was set up to engage younger views, and now they've engaged younger viewers, they don't see the need to carry on because of funding. They're going against their commitment to young people.

I'm personally fed-up of half arsed apologies from the coalition...

Sign the petition here: http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/to-the-bbc-trust-savebbc3
Follow my Blog on Bloglovin here